« École polytechnique » : différence entre les versions
Contenu supprimé Contenu ajouté
m →Autres écrits : en français c'est possible ? |
Annulation des modifications 174302 de FrankyLeRoutier (discussion) |
||
Ligne 211 :
|année=1927
|page=735
}}
== Autres écrits ==
{{Citation|Both the two great intellectual forces which in the course of the nineteenth century transformed social thought modern socialism and that species of modern positivism, which we prefer to call scientism, spring directly from this body of professional scientists and engineers which grew up in Paris, and more particularly from the new institution which embodied the new spirit as no other, the Ecole polytechnique.}}
{{Réf Livre
|langue=en
|titre=The Counter Revolution Of Science : Studies on the Abuse of Reason
|partie=II
|chapitre=I (« The source of the scientistic hubris: l'École Polytechnique »)
|auteur=Friedrich Hayek
|éditeur=Liberty Fund
|année=1955
|page=103
}}
{{Citation|Not only in secondary education but still more so in higher education the Revolutionary Convention had created a new type of institution which was to become permanently established and a model imitated by the whole world: the Ecole Polytechnique.}}
{{Réf Livre
|langue=en
|titre=The Counter Revolution Of Science : Studies on the Abuse of Reason
|partie=II
|chapitre=I (« The source of the scientistic hubris: l'École Polytechnique »)
|auteur=Friedrich Hayek
|éditeur=Liberty Fund
|année=1955
|page=111
}}
{{Citation|The institution had only existed for a few years when it had become famous all over Europe, and the first interval of peace in 1801-2 brought Volta, Count Rumford and Alexander von Humboldt on pilgrimage to the new temple of science.}}
{{Réf Livre
|langue=en
|titre=The Counter Revolution Of Science : Studies on the Abuse of Reason
|partie=II
|chapitre=I (« The source of the scientistic hubris: l'École Polytechnique »)
|auteur=Friedrich Hayek
|éditeur=Liberty Fund
|année=1955
|page=112
}}
{{Citation|The very type of the engineer with his characteristic outlook, ambitions, and limitations was here created. That synthetic spirit which would not recognize sense in anything that had not been deliberately con-
structed, that love of organization that springs from the twin sources of military and engineering practices, 33 the aesthetic predilection for everything that had been consciously constructed over anything that
had "just grown," was a strong new element which was added to and in the course of time even began to replace the revolutionary ardor of the young polytechnicians. The peculiar characteristics of this new type who, as it has been said, "prided themselves on having more precise and more satisfactory solutions than anyone else for all political, religious and social questions," 34 and who "ventured to create a religion as one learns at the Ecole to build a bridge or a road" 35 was early noticed, and their propensity to become socialists has often been pointed out.}}
{{Réf Livre
|langue=en
|titre=The Counter Revolution Of Science : Studies on the Abuse of Reason
|partie=II
|chapitre=I (« The source of the scientistic hubris: l'École Polytechnique »)
|auteur=Friedrich Hayek
|éditeur=Liberty Fund
|année=1955
|page=113
}}
| |||